30-YR FIXED6.71% +0.0515-YR FIXED6.04% +0.0610-YR TREASURY4.79% +0.0430-YR TREASURY5.27% +0.025-YR TREASURY4.55% +0.062-YR TREASURY4.39% +0.05FED FUNDS3.75% 0.00SOFR3.65% -0.01DOW53,062 +295S&P 5007,667 +35Freddie Mac · U.S. Treasury · Federal Reserve via FRED®30-YR FIXED6.71% +0.0515-YR FIXED6.04% +0.0610-YR TREASURY4.79% +0.0430-YR TREASURY5.27% +0.025-YR TREASURY4.55% +0.062-YR TREASURY4.39% +0.05FED FUNDS3.75% 0.00SOFR3.65% -0.01DOW53,062 +295S&P 5007,667 +35Freddie Mac · U.S. Treasury · Federal Reserve via FRED®
Thursday, September 3, 2026Bay Area Market: Coverage updated daily

Why a signature Newsom power move flopped in the last days of the Legislative session

The lame-duck governor’s penchant for pushing last-minute demands on California’s Legislature didn’t work out as it has in years past.

Bay Area suburban homes and streets
Curated News BriefBased on original reporting by CalMatters Housing (September 2, 2026). The summary below is the Journal’s; the local analysis is original commentary by Omar Murillo.

Look, I want to walk you through something important that just happened up in Sacramento that affects all of us in real estate and beyond. According to CalMatters Housing, Governor Newsom tried to push through some major legislation in the final days of the legislative session, but for the first time in a while, his typical playbook just didn't work out the way he's become accustomed to.

The governor wanted to reduce what utilities have to pay after their equipment causes wildfires by preventing insurance companies from suing those utilities to recover their losses. This was a big ask tied to the recent Los Angeles-area fires and the financial strain facing our major power companies. But after weeks of pushback from lawmakers and wildfire survivors, the Assembly voted down a compromise that Newsom had already signed off on. The Assembly Speaker said the bill amounted to half measures, and California deserves better than that.

This whole situation shows us that even a high-profile, ambitious governor loses some of his leverage when he's on his way out. Newsom has built a reputation in Sacramento for what folks call a "jam" — pushing major deals through at the last minute through closed-door negotiations, with little time for public input or amendments. It's worked before on environmental law and infrastructure projects, but this time it didn't stick.

The governor wasn't shy about acknowledging the reality. He told reporters he's got a sell-by date and gets it. He even said the final version didn't address the underlying structural problem, and he pointed to the major utilities' plunging stock prices as evidence of that failure. He's asking the next administration to tackle this issue when he's gone.

This wasn't Newsom's only stumble at the finish line either. He also failed to get fast-tracked approval for California Forever, the tech-backed project in Solano County, and he backed away from pushing a Santa Monica housing project through the coastal approval process. The opposition he faced came from real grassroots concerns and philosophical disagreements, not just personal defiance.

What I'm seeing locally is that these late-game legislative battles matter for how we do business in the Bay Area and East Bay. When utilities face uncertain financial futures, it affects everything from development timelines to insurance costs that get passed down to buyers and sellers. The uncertainty around these power companies and their ability to operate isn't settled yet, and that's going to keep affecting the market until the legislature finds real answers rather than half measures.