30-YR FIXED6.71% +0.0515-YR FIXED6.04% +0.0610-YR TREASURY4.79% +0.0430-YR TREASURY5.27% +0.025-YR TREASURY4.55% +0.062-YR TREASURY4.39% +0.05FED FUNDS3.75% 0.00SOFR3.65% -0.01DOW53,062 +295S&P 5007,667 +35Freddie Mac · U.S. Treasury · Federal Reserve via FRED®30-YR FIXED6.71% +0.0515-YR FIXED6.04% +0.0610-YR TREASURY4.79% +0.0430-YR TREASURY5.27% +0.025-YR TREASURY4.55% +0.062-YR TREASURY4.39% +0.05FED FUNDS3.75% 0.00SOFR3.65% -0.01DOW53,062 +295S&P 5007,667 +35Freddie Mac · U.S. Treasury · Federal Reserve via FRED®
Thursday, September 3, 2026Bay Area Market: Coverage updated daily

Fire-Prone Parts of Rural Northern California Are Losing Residents, Bucking National Trend

Tuolumne County, CA, in the Yosemite foothills, lost more residents than any other fire-prone U.S. county in 2025. It was followed closely by Sutter County, also in rural Northern California. Just one-third of the country’s 308 fire-prone counties lost more residents than they gained, while the other two-thirds gained population.  Pinal County, AZ, located between…

East Bay residential neighborhood, California
Curated News BriefBased on original reporting by Redfin News (July 27, 2026). The summary below is the Journal’s; the local analysis is original commentary by Omar Murillo.

According to a Redfin News analysis, something unusual is happening in fire-prone Northern California. While roughly two-thirds of fire-prone counties across the entire United States are actually gaining residents, several rural Northern California counties are moving in the opposite direction and losing population. This reversal is notable because it goes against the broader national pattern where people continue to relocate to risky fire areas.

The data shows some significant losses in specific counties. Tuolumne County in the Yosemite foothills experienced the largest net outflow among fire-prone counties, losing substantially more residents than it gained last year, marking the first time in a decade this has happened. Sutter County north of Sacramento had the second-biggest outflow and has now experienced three straight years of people leaving. Lassen County, way up in far northeastern California, has been losing residents for eight consecutive years.

What's driving these departures? According to Redfin's chief economist, it's not wildfire risk alone that's pushing people out. Instead, it's a combination of factors hitting these areas simultaneously. Rising insurance costs, a shortage of available housing, limited job growth opportunities, and geographic isolation are all stacking together against these communities. Even though they still offer appealing outdoor recreation and scenic beauty at relatively affordable prices compared to other parts of California, these advantages aren't enough to keep people there anymore.

The contrast with other fire-prone areas tells an interesting story. Communities that are gaining significant populations despite fire risk tend to have something these Northern California counties lack: they're either near major job centers where people can commute, or they offer economic opportunities of their own. Pinal County, Arizona, between Phoenix and Tucson, is gaining residents in large numbers partly because homes cost less than in nearby Phoenix while remaining commutable. Washington County, Utah, attracts newcomers through its warm climate, outdoor recreation access, and jobs in healthcare, construction, and tourism.

What I am seeing locally here in the Bay Area and East Bay is that fire risk is becoming an increasingly important factor in how people make housing decisions, but it's not the only one. When fire risk combines with limited economic opportunity and isolation, people really do vote with their feet. This suggests that communities need to think holistically about what keeps residents stable, not just about managing wildfire preparedness alone.