30-YR FIXED6.71% +0.0515-YR FIXED6.04% +0.0610-YR TREASURY4.79% 0.0030-YR TREASURY5.27% 0.005-YR TREASURY4.54% -0.012-YR TREASURY4.39% 0.00FED FUNDS3.75% 0.00SOFR3.65% -0.01DOW53,686 +624S&P 5007,667 +35Freddie Mac · U.S. Treasury · Federal Reserve via FRED®30-YR FIXED6.71% +0.0515-YR FIXED6.04% +0.0610-YR TREASURY4.79% 0.0030-YR TREASURY5.27% 0.005-YR TREASURY4.54% -0.012-YR TREASURY4.39% 0.00FED FUNDS3.75% 0.00SOFR3.65% -0.01DOW53,686 +624S&P 5007,667 +35Freddie Mac · U.S. Treasury · Federal Reserve via FRED®
Thursday, September 3, 2026Bay Area Market: Coverage updated daily

Controversial swan hunt appears to work: California’s mute swan population drops

Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a law last year allowing Californians to kill non native mute swans. It appeared to have worked.

East Bay hills and homes at dusk
Curated News BriefBased on original reporting by CalMatters Housing (August 4, 2026). The summary below is the Journal’s; the local analysis is original commentary by Omar Murillo.

You know, I came across an interesting story from CalMatters Housing about something that's been affecting our local wetlands right here around the Bay Area. Governor Newsom signed a law last year that allowed property owners and licensed hunters to cull the non-native mute swan population, and according to recent data from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, it's actually working. The state's mute swan numbers have dropped significantly, down to around 7,400 birds compared to where they were just a year before the law took effect.

What's remarkable about this is how fast the problem had grown in the first place. These birds, which are native to Europe and Asia, somehow made their way into California after that 2008 ban on importing them without permits. Even though the ban was in place, some swans escaped or were released from captivity, and their population absolutely exploded. In just a handful of years before the new law, the numbers went from around 1,500 birds to around 15,000, with most of them concentrated in the Suisun Marsh area just outside our region.

The reason wildlife officials felt so strongly about controlling this population comes down to environmental impact. These birds are hefty creatures, weighing up to thirty pounds, and they're intensely territorial. Because they don't migrate, they stay year-round and can absolutely devastate the native vegetation that marshes depend on. They'll eat through the submerged plants that other waterfowl rely on for survival, and during breeding season they'll actually harass or kill native ducks and geese. That's serious business for our already fragile Delta ecosystem.

I should mention that animal welfare advocates raised concerns about the hunting approach, and there were folks who felt there had to be better ways to manage the population. Despite that opposition, the bill that Governor Newsom signed passed without any lawmakers voting against it, so there was pretty broad agreement that something needed to be done.

What I'm seeing locally is that wildlife management sometimes requires tough choices that don't sit well with everyone. The data suggests the approach is working, and that matters for our region because the health of our wetlands affects everything from groundwater to biodiversity to our long-term environmental sustainability. Even in real estate, you start to understand how these larger environmental trends shape property values and livability in communities around the Delta.