30-YR FIXED6.71% +0.0515-YR FIXED6.04% +0.0610-YR TREASURY4.79% +0.0430-YR TREASURY5.27% +0.025-YR TREASURY4.55% +0.062-YR TREASURY4.39% +0.05FED FUNDS3.75% 0.00SOFR3.65% -0.01DOW53,062 +295S&P 5007,667 +35Freddie Mac · U.S. Treasury · Federal Reserve via FRED®30-YR FIXED6.71% +0.0515-YR FIXED6.04% +0.0610-YR TREASURY4.79% +0.0430-YR TREASURY5.27% +0.025-YR TREASURY4.55% +0.062-YR TREASURY4.39% +0.05FED FUNDS3.75% 0.00SOFR3.65% -0.01DOW53,062 +295S&P 5007,667 +35Freddie Mac · U.S. Treasury · Federal Reserve via FRED®
Thursday, September 3, 2026Bay Area Market: Coverage updated daily

Federal agencies scrap Biden-era SPCP guidance

Interagency notice tells lenders not to rely on 2022 SPCP statement

Bay Area suburban homes and streets
Curated News BriefBased on original reporting by HousingWire (August 25, 2026). The summary below is the Journal’s; the local analysis is original commentary by Omar Murillo.

According to HousingWire, federal agencies have rescinded a statement from 2022 that had given lenders encouragement to create Special Purpose Credit Programs designed to help historically disadvantaged groups access credit more easily. The rescission took effect immediately and was announced in the Federal Register by seven federal agencies working together, including HUD, the Consumer Financial Protection Board, the Department of Justice, and several banking regulators. The agencies made clear that lenders should no longer rely on that Biden-era guidance going forward.

The agencies stated that the prior guidance conflicted with the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and the Fair Housing Act, and they wanted to ensure creditors understand they cannot discriminate based on protected characteristics like race, color, national origin, or sex. According to the notice, the earlier guidance had referenced an outdated version of lending regulations that allowed race-based programs under certain circumstances, but those provisions no longer reflect current law. The agencies emphasized that their enhanced standards in the revised regulations align with what the statute actually says about nondiscrimination.

The agencies also pointed to recent Supreme Court precedent on race-conscious policies, noting that simply wanting to remedy broader societal discrimination does not meet the legal standards for race-based programs. HUD framed this as a shift away from policies that favored certain groups of Americans, while emphasizing that lenders were never actually permitted to discriminate in the first place. The department connected the rollback to presidential executive orders directing agencies to unwind diversity and inclusion initiatives.

In statements, federal officials said it is illegal to favor individuals for housing or credit based on protected characteristics, and one official compared discriminatory equity efforts to historical systems of discrimination. The department indicated it would enforce these principles going forward.

What I am seeing locally here in the Bay Area and across the East Bay is that this kind of policy shift creates uncertainty for lenders trying to stay compliant. These changes affect how programs that aimed to help underserved borrowers get mortgages will operate going forward, and that's something both buyers and sellers should understand as it may influence lending practices and availability in our market.