30-YR FIXED6.71% +0.0515-YR FIXED6.04% +0.0610-YR TREASURY4.79% +0.0430-YR TREASURY5.27% +0.025-YR TREASURY4.55% +0.062-YR TREASURY4.39% +0.05FED FUNDS3.75% 0.00SOFR3.65% -0.01DOW53,062 +295S&P 5007,667 +35Freddie Mac · U.S. Treasury · Federal Reserve via FRED®30-YR FIXED6.71% +0.0515-YR FIXED6.04% +0.0610-YR TREASURY4.79% +0.0430-YR TREASURY5.27% +0.025-YR TREASURY4.55% +0.062-YR TREASURY4.39% +0.05FED FUNDS3.75% 0.00SOFR3.65% -0.01DOW53,062 +295S&P 5007,667 +35Freddie Mac · U.S. Treasury · Federal Reserve via FRED®
Thursday, September 3, 2026Bay Area Market: Coverage updated daily

California to get more power to sue big businesses under anti-monopoly bill going to Newsom

California prosecutors would gain new powers to sue big businesses over alleged anti-competitive practices under a bill Democratic lawmakers sent to Gov. Gavin Newsom.

Bay Area housing and community
Curated News BriefBased on original reporting by CalMatters Housing (August 31, 2026). The summary below is the Journal’s; the local analysis is original commentary by Omar Murillo.

I wanted to fill you in on something that just hit my desk courtesy of CalMatters Housing. California's legislature has sent Governor Newsom a bill that would give our state prosecutors some real teeth when it comes to fighting what they see as unfair business practices. Right now, under a law from 1907 called the Cartwright Act, prosecutors can only sue businesses if multiple companies are working together to squash competition. This new bill would change that game and let them go after individual big businesses acting alone.

The bill, called the Compete Act or Assembly Bill 1776, made its way through both chambers with pretty solid support, though I'll tell you there was a real battle behind the scenes. According to CalMatters, it came down as a compromise after the original version got scaled back. The author, Assemblymember Cecilia Aguiar-Curry from Davis, pushed this through because she and other backers argue that business consolidation over the past couple of decades has gotten out of hand. They point to situations where big players are using unfair tactics to lock out competitors and keep prices high.

You've got to understand what drew the battle lines here. Consumer groups, unions, and small business organizations all got behind this thing, saying it would protect workers and small operators from being crushed by corporate giants. But California's Chamber of Commerce came out swinging hard against it, calling it flawed and dangerous. They even put billboards up at the Capitol and ran a seven-figure advertising campaign to sink the proposal. Despite all that noise, both the Senate and Assembly passed it with most Republicans voting against it and most Democrats voting for it.

One thing that's still unclear is how much this will actually cost the state to enforce. The Department of Finance raised concerns about that, and honestly, there's a fair question about whether existing accounts set aside for antitrust work will be enough to cover the legal bills if the Attorney General decides to bring a bunch of cases. That said, California's current Attorney General Rob Bonta has shown he's willing to jump into these fights, so we might see some real action here.

What I am seeing locally is that East Bay and Bay Area small business owners are watching this closely because they've felt the squeeze from bigger players moving into their markets. Whether this bill actually becomes law and what teeth it will have once it's implemented remains to be seen, but there's clearly momentum building to protect competition in our region. The real impact will depend on how aggressively it gets used and whether the state properly funds the enforcement.