30-YR FIXED6.71% +0.0515-YR FIXED6.04% +0.0610-YR TREASURY4.79% +0.0430-YR TREASURY5.27% +0.025-YR TREASURY4.55% +0.062-YR TREASURY4.39% +0.05FED FUNDS3.75% 0.00SOFR3.65% -0.01DOW53,062 +295S&P 5007,667 +35Freddie Mac · U.S. Treasury · Federal Reserve via FRED®30-YR FIXED6.71% +0.0515-YR FIXED6.04% +0.0610-YR TREASURY4.79% +0.0430-YR TREASURY5.27% +0.025-YR TREASURY4.55% +0.062-YR TREASURY4.39% +0.05FED FUNDS3.75% 0.00SOFR3.65% -0.01DOW53,062 +295S&P 5007,667 +35Freddie Mac · U.S. Treasury · Federal Reserve via FRED®
Thursday, September 3, 2026Bay Area Market: Coverage updated daily

Condo no-go: California defect reform fails at deadline

Late Senate amendments sent AB 1903 back to the Assembly; the legislative session clock ran out before a vote

Bay Area suburban homes and streets
Curated News BriefBased on original reporting by HousingWire (September 1, 2026). The summary below is the Journal’s; the local analysis is original commentary by Omar Murillo.

According to HousingWire, California's Assembly Bill 1903, which aimed to reform how condo construction defects are handled under state law, stalled after the legislative session ended without a final Assembly vote. The bill had passed the state Senate late Sunday night, but time ran out before it could be voted on in the Assembly. The legislation went through multiple rounds of amendments as it moved between chambers, which ultimately slowed its progress toward passage.

The bill was part of a broader effort by housing advocates to encourage more condo construction in California by revising the state's Right to Repair Act, which has been on the books since 2003. Housing advocates, including the pro-housing group California YIMBY, hoped that reforming condo defect liability rules would help revive a condo market that has struggled significantly since its peak after 2007. The bill had actually cleared the Assembly back in May with no opposing votes, but the Senate introduced substantial changes over the summer.

Consumer attorneys, HOA groups, and other opponents argued that AB 1903 would have made it harder for homeowners to identify widespread construction problems and file claims before damage worsened. They contended the bill essentially transferred risk away from builders and onto homeowners themselves. Interestingly, the Senate's own committee analysis raised doubts about whether fixing defect liability rules would even solve the real problem facing condo development.

The Senate committee's analysis found that litigation over construction defects is not actually the main reason condo production has declined in California. Instead, the committee identified rising labor and material costs, permitting requirements and associated fees, regulatory obstacles, local opposition to housing, financing challenges, buyer demand issues, land values, and construction timelines as the primary culprits. Outside research the committee cited concluded that while defect litigation does add costs, it is not the "sole or even the primary cause" of weak condo development.

Despite bipartisan support and continued pressure from industry groups to ease liability rules, the setback leaves both major condo-related bills on the sidelines for now. California YIMBY indicated they plan to keep working on construction defect reform in the future as part of their broader effort to increase affordable housing options for residents.

What I am seeing locally here in the Bay Area and East Bay is that anything that might help revive condo construction is worth paying attention to, because we just do not have enough of these properties for first-time buyers and people looking for lower-cost entry points into ownership. The fact that this reform stalled tells me we are still going to be fighting an uphill battle when it comes to expanding housing supply, and the real obstacles go much deeper than just liability concerns.