30-YR FIXED6.71% +0.0515-YR FIXED6.04% +0.0610-YR TREASURY4.79% +0.0430-YR TREASURY5.27% +0.025-YR TREASURY4.55% +0.062-YR TREASURY4.39% +0.05FED FUNDS3.75% 0.00SOFR3.65% -0.01DOW53,062 +295S&P 5007,667 +35Freddie Mac · U.S. Treasury · Federal Reserve via FRED®30-YR FIXED6.71% +0.0515-YR FIXED6.04% +0.0610-YR TREASURY4.79% +0.0430-YR TREASURY5.27% +0.025-YR TREASURY4.55% +0.062-YR TREASURY4.39% +0.05FED FUNDS3.75% 0.00SOFR3.65% -0.01DOW53,062 +295S&P 5007,667 +35Freddie Mac · U.S. Treasury · Federal Reserve via FRED®
Thursday, September 3, 2026Bay Area Market: Coverage updated daily

MBA president fires back on claims of poor FHA underwriting

Bob Broeksmit said WSJ op-ed erroneously linked the health of an independent lender to the health of the FHA’s Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund

Fremont and Tri-City area homes
Curated News BriefBased on original reporting by HousingWire (August 28, 2026). The summary below is the Journal’s; the local analysis is original commentary by Omar Murillo.

I wanted to walk you through something that's been getting attention in the mortgage world this week. According to HousingWire, the president of the Mortgage Bankers Association came out swinging against a Wall Street Journal opinion piece that tied United Wholesale Mortgage's recent capital raise to broader problems with FHA lending. The Journal had suggested that UWM's decision to bring in roughly two billion dollars in funding signaled trouble with how FHA mortgages are being underwritten and that taxpayers could end up footing the bill if things go south.

Bob Broeksmit, who heads the MBA, basically said the Journal was connecting dots that shouldn't be connected. He pointed out that the FHA's insurance fund is sitting at a healthy capital ratio well above what Congress requires, and he's held that position for over a decade now. When it comes to the rising delinquency numbers everyone's talking about, Broeksmit argues that's just what naturally happens when you wind down the forbearance programs that kept borrowers afloat during the pandemic. That's a temporary adjustment, not a sign the program itself is broken.

The Journal had raised some legitimate points about who's originating mortgages these days. Independent mortgage banks like UWM are handling the vast majority of FHA loans, and delinquency rates have ticked up compared to a year ago. They also noted that FHA borrowers tend to have lower down payments, higher debt levels relative to their income, and smaller cash reserves than conventional borrowers, which does limit their options when times get tough.

But here's where Broeksmit draws the line: he's saying UWM's capital infusion is really about that one company making a bad bet on interest rates, not evidence that the whole FHA lending market is reckless. He's pushing back on the idea that private lenders are deliberately making risky loans because they know the government will bail out borrowers who get into trouble. Industry observers seem to agree that the uptick in foreclosures we're seeing is more about people struggling with everyday costs and a return to normal activity after several years of artificially low foreclosure numbers.

What I am seeing locally with my clients is that this conversation matters for how people think about FHA loans in the Bay Area and East Bay. Folks get nervous when they see headlines about rising delinquencies and government insurance funds, but the reality is more nuanced. FHA programs have helped a lot of first-time buyers in our region get into homes, and the fund itself appears solid. The stress we're seeing is largely a correction to the unusual conditions we lived through during and after the pandemic, not a sign that lenders are recklessly pushing people into mortgages they can't handle.