30-YR FIXED7.40%▬ 0.0015-YR FIXED6.71%▼ -0.0210-YR TREASURY5.10%▼ -0.0930-YR TREASURY5.43%▼ -0.095-YR TREASURY4.91%▼ -0.092-YR TREASURY4.77%▼ -0.05FED FUNDS4.00%▬ 0.00SOFR3.89%▲ +0.01DOW52,002▼ -175S&P 5007,659▼ -85Freddie Mac · U.S. Treasury · Federal Reserve via FRED®30-YR FIXED7.40%▬ 0.0015-YR FIXED6.71%▼ -0.0210-YR TREASURY5.10%▼ -0.0930-YR TREASURY5.43%▼ -0.095-YR TREASURY4.91%▼ -0.092-YR TREASURY4.77%▼ -0.05FED FUNDS4.00%▬ 0.00SOFR3.89%▲ +0.01DOW52,002▼ -175S&P 5007,659▼ -85Freddie Mac · U.S. Treasury · Federal Reserve via FRED®
Monday, October 19, 2026Bay Area Market: Coverage updated daily

They made misleading election claims. Now they’re targeting CA counties

Are election deniers and affiliated groups gathering evidence for a potential Stop the Steal 2.0 campaign in California? That was the question CalMatters reporters set out to answer earlier this year. We made requests in a sampling of geographically and politically diverse counties for logs from their elections offices that detail who’s seeking election records…

Fremont and Tri-City area homes
Curated News BriefBased on original reporting by CalMatters Housing (October 8, 2026). The summary below is the Journal’s; the local analysis is original commentary by Omar Murillo.

I want to walk you through something CalMatters just reported that's relevant to what we're seeing in election offices across California right now. Their reporters filed public records requests with a range of counties throughout the state to find out who's been asking for election materials and why. What they uncovered is that various groups associated with election denial movements have been systematically requesting records from these offices.

The timing of all this is striking because we've already seen some high-profile incidents get law enforcement attention. The FBI visited Shasta County's elections office, and earlier this year the Riverside County Sheriff actually seized hundreds of thousands of ballots. These moves suggest that some in law enforcement are treating these activists' fraud claims as credible investigations, even though election experts and the officials running our elections say there's simply no evidence backing up these allegations.

According to CalMatters, the records requests are coming from groups connected to election denial narratives and claims that continue to circulate despite being thoroughly debunked. The story raises an important question about whether we're seeing a coordinated effort building evidence for what could become another broad challenge to election integrity, similar to what happened after the 2020 presidential race.

There's an interesting tension here when it comes to how lawmakers should respond. Ginny LaRoe, who works with the First Amendment Coalition, made a good point to CalMatters that we shouldn't respond to election misinformation by making it harder for regular citizens to access public records. The answer to bad information isn't to close the doors on transparency, even when that transparency is being exploited by people with questionable motives.

What I'm seeing locally in my conversations with both buyers and sellers is growing concern about the stability and trustworthiness of our systems. When people don't feel confident in how elections are being run or that baseless claims are being taken seriously by some officials, it affects their broader sense of security and their willingness to invest in property here. This kind of persistent questioning of election integrity erodes the confidence that communities need to function well, and that matters to our real estate market just like it matters to everything else.